Looking for:
Question 1 massachusetts
Click here to ENTER
Do you approve of the adoption of an amendment to the constitution question 1 massachusetts below, which was approved by the General Court massachuswtts joint sessions question 1 massachusetts the two houses on June 12, yeas — nays 48 ; and again on June 9, yeas — nays 41?
This masschusetts level would be adjusted annually, by the same method used for federal income-tax brackets, to reflect increases in the cost of living. Revenues from this tax would be used, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature, for public education, public colleges and universities; and for the repair and maintenance of roads, bridges, and public transportation.
Перейти на источник proposed amendment would apply to tax years quesgion on or after January 1, As required by law, statements of fiscal consequences are written by the Executive Office of Administration and Finance. However, annual revenue generated by the surtax will vary significantly and unpredictably from question 1 massachusetts to year.
Question 1 massachusetts, numerous unpredictable factors could significantly alter the impact this proposal may have on state and municipal finances. For instance, taxpayers may decide to relocate their home or business to another state or adjust their filing status or timing of income realization to minimize their tax burden.
As provided massachusettss law, the word arguments are written by proponents and opponents of each question, and reflect their opinions. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts does not endorse these arguments, and does not certify the truth or accuracy of any statement made in these arguments.
The names of the individuals and organizations who wrote each argument, and any written comments by others about each argument, are question 1 massachusetts file in the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Current tax rules allow multimillionaires to pay a smaller share in taxes than the rest of us.
The additional money is constitutionally guaranteed to go toward transportation and public education. Question 1 means every здесь can go questioj a great school. We can fix our roads, expand access to vocational training, and make public colleges more affordable.
Excellent roads and schools help our small businesses grow, create new jobs, and build strong communities. Question 1 means creating opportunity for everyone. Organizations representing over 20, small businesses and family farmers urge: Vote NO on Question 1. Terms and Conditions. Accessibility Statement. Home Directions Contact Us. Listing of Counties and Communities within. All CIS Publications. Information, Forms, and Search.
Как сообщается здесь Corporation Act Information. Where Do I Vote? Citizens Voting for Persons with Disabilities. Click here to research lobbyist and client filing details. General Information. Rehabilitation Tax Credit Awards New! A Guide to Mass. Database Records Retention Sched. Help Statewide Agency Sched.
Question 1 massachusetts the Bookstore Bookstore. About the Code of Massachusetts Regulations Subscription. Policy Statement. Tour Information Question 1 massachusetts Guides Gazette Newsletter New! Did You Know? Become a State House Question 1 massachusetts Guide! The Doric Docents. Western Office Southeastern Office.
Who is eligible to apply? How question 1 massachusetts I apply? Who can become an application assistant?
Question 1 Massachusetts Opponents Launch Ad Campaign – NBC Boston.Ballot Question 1: Right to Repair |
This constitutional protection makes it difficult for the Legislature to increase income tax rates because any rate increase affects all Massachusetts taxpayers i. Since , voters have decisively rejected five different ballot questions that aimed to remove this taxpayer protection by margins of at least Now, proponents of Question 1 are at it again, threatening to undo this important constitutional protection and to create a precedent for the Legislature to divide taxpayers into groups in order to tax them at different rates.
If voters remove this taxpayer protection from our Constitution, a dangerous precedent will be set and the door will be wide open for politicians to create additional tax brackets and higher rates, eventually targeting middle class workers and families. Because this precedent would be locked into our Constitution, passage of another constitutional amendment will be required to repeal or fix it when things turn out badly.
Question 1 is deceptive. It provides no guarantee that the new money from this huge tax increase would actually increase spending on education and transportation, despite claims by its proponents. In , Beacon Hill politicians rejected two amendments that would have required the new tax revenues to be used to increase funding for education and transportation.
Instead, under this language, politicians could legally use the appropriations process to divert existing dollars away from education and transportation—and use them instead for pet projects—while funding for education and transportation could remain the same or even decrease.
Question 1 is also deceptive because it is not uniquely a tax on people currently earning an income of a million dollars annually. Unlike federal taxes on personal income, the ballot question would apply to one-time gains—such as those from selling a business or home.
So, the nest eggs of many small business owners and longtime homeowners whose retirement depends on their investments would be taxed if this measure is passed. While some big corporations may have resources and techniques to avoid the increased taxes forced by this ballot question, small business owners will be left reeling from an unprecedented new financial hit. Last year, in fact, Massachusetts reached a five year high for residents moving to other states.
And, with new work-from-home flexibility, Massachusetts is among seven states with the highest rate of outmigration. If the ballot question is approved, even more people, businesses, and jobs will leave. As we continue to navigate the COVID pandemic, and deal with inflation and supply chain difficulties, we must support our local economy and small businesses.
Massachusetts should work to be a place where local businesses can thrive — not passing huge tax hikes that will badly hurt small businesses and result in even more lost jobs, at the worst possible time. Proponents of Question 1 would have Massachusetts residents believe that some of our most important spending priorities are falling behind.
On infrastructure, state politicians have shown themselves to be reckless and inefficient with existing infrastructure funds, leading to the Massachusetts highway system ranking 47th nationally in cost-effectiveness. Before raising taxes and penalizing small business owners, large employers and retirees, politicians should learn to be more efficient with existing funding from taxpayer dollars. Get The Facts. Information about Question 1 Massachusetts Tax Hike Amendment Question 1 would impose giant tax increases in Massachusetts — damaging our economy, threatening small business owners, and resulting in even more lost jobs and people leaving Massachusetts.
Imposes one of the largest tax hikes in Massachusetts history. Removes a constitutional taxpayer protection. Gives politicians a blank check, with no accountability. Taxes the nest eggs of homeowners, retirees and small businesses.
Damages our economy when MA already has a giant budget surplus. Imposes one of the largest income tax hikes in MA history. I am signing up as: Required An individual. Organization Required. Business Leader. Consumer Advocate. Contractor and Remodeler. Healthcare Worker. Public Safety Officer. Real Estate Agent.
Small Business Owner. Taxpayer Advocate. Union Member. Other Required. First Name Required. Last Name Required. E-mail Required. Zip Code Required. Writing a letter to the editor or written testimonial. Filming a video testimonial. Recruiting friends and family. Message and data rates may apply.
Reply “STOP” to opt out. Text “HELP” for help. Join our Coalition.
